Showing posts with label Equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Equality. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Symbolism


It’s been a banner week for angering conservatives. The biggest story, of course, is the ruling on marriage equality. I’m not going to talk about that here, as I’ve made my position on that abundantly clear in previous posts (In fact, “patio furniture” is the most frequent phrase I hear when people talk to me about my writing). Instead, I’d like to address the uproar over the removal of the Confederate battle flag from the South Carolina State Capitol, as well as the removal of the Ten Commandments from the Oklahoma State Capitol.

I’m going to come right out and say it: neither the Confederate flag nor the Ten Commandments belong anywhere in, on, or about a government facility. The base reason for both is the same. Government facilities belong to all citizens, and should not be hostile or preferential toward one subset of those citizens.

The Confederate flag is a powerful symbol. However, it is the symbol of a failed ideology. Yes, failed. The South (spoiler alert) lost the Civil War. I can't think of another example of a defeated flag carrying as much weight or being held onto as fiercely as this. That flag still has its place, and that place is a museum. Other than that, it’s just a symbol for slavery and deeply-held racism for most of the rest of the country, - if not the world - despite your “Heritage, not hate” bumper sticker.

If I wore a t-shirt with a giant swastika on the front, I would almost certainly be confronted and called any number of names by passers-by on the street, despite the fact that the swastika predates the Nazi party my many thousand years. Even having the arms of the swastika bent to the left, rather than the right, would most likely not reduce the tongue-lashing I would undoubtedly receive. Why? Because it’s an inflammatory symbol. So is the Confederate flag. It’s time to let it go.

Now. The Ten Commandments. Prominently displayed in, or in front of, a government building, implies that the institution holds to those precepts. But given the fact that the Ten Commandments comes from the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy, only Christians and Jews are represented by the symbolic placement. Every other religion is marginalized by this symbol. When (depending on your preferred numbering scheme) four or five of the Commandments dictate religious concerns, the decision to remove them from a state capitol seems to be a no-brainer. And let’s face it – the religious commandments aren’t even enforced by our legal system. They simply don’t belong.

If you, personally, believe in and abide by the Ten Commandments, great! More power to you. I don’t think you should shake your fists and throw a tantrum because not everyone agrees with you. Your religious freedoms are not being taken away from you. The state just isn’t marginalizing its other citizens to make you feel more in control.

I think it’s high time that we dial down the rhetoric several hundred notches. Just as no one is implying that removing the Confederate flag is a magic bullet to end racism once-and-for-all, no one is saying that you can’t go to church anymore because a statue of the Ten Commandments no longer sits on the steps of the capitol building. It’s time to acknowledge that symbols have power and meaning, and that here in America – a country built on the inclusion of all – we should take care not to allow our symbols to hurt, intimidate, or marginalize our fellow Americans.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

It's Not (Necessarily) Hate

Amidst a Facebook newsfeed largely comprised of red equal signs, I saw a phrase that I took some exception to: Str8 Against H8 (Straight Against Hate).  On the surface, there's nothing wrong here.  I am also straight and am not particularly pro-hate.  I understand that equal marriage rights are a huge deal right now.  Personally, I don't care if you marry your patio furniture.  It doesn't change my marriage in any way. 

No, the problem I have is this wholesale appropriation of the word "hate" by the LGBT community to label anyone who doesn't agree with them.  It's certainly an effective political tool, and one that I'm certain has rallied more than a few to their cause.  I mean, let's be honest - who wants to be viewed as someone who HATES an entire subsection of our society?  Anyone?  Probably not.  From a purely psychological standpoint, I bet there a good number of people who look at this propaganda-esque usage of the word and jumped on board, just to escape the label.  Very clever, LGBT community.

However, I'm going to go ahead and cry foul here.  I am not a stupid person, and I understand that this "hate" label is largely being leveled at Christians, right-wing-ers, evangelicals, fundamentalists, and whatever other groups are not on board with gay marriage, regardless of reasoning.  This lack of concern for the reason of one's opposition is my problem, and I'm going to say this loud and clear:

Religious conviction is not the same thing as hate.

It just isn't - regardless of willy-nilly application of labels.  As I've already stated, I'm not a stupid person.  I am sadly aware that some (perhaps many) people who oppose gay marriage do hate homosexuals.  It's unfortunate that, if these people who do hate - and do so in the name of God - are ignorant and are also, quite frankly, doing it wrong.  Scripture tells us to love each other many more times than it condemns homosexuality.  Actually, in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, amongst the people who are listed as not inheriting the kingdom of God are, yes, homosexuals.  Right alongside them are: the sexually immoral (which is a BROAD topic), idolators (anyone who places anything else above God), adulterers, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, and swindlers.  Certainly, most of us (myself included) fall into one or more of these categories - even the Christians.  The only hope any of us have is the salvation as noted in v. 11 - sanctification in Jesus Christ.

Now, where am I going with this?  Mostly, I just think it's unfair for everyone who disagrees with a particular issue to have this "hate" label applied to them.  For a group (the LGBT community) who is trying so hard to be accepted and normalized in society, this approach seems a bit counter-productive to me.  As I've said in other posts - if you're asking for tolerance and acceptance, try practicing a little.  Casting anyone who doesn't agree with you as an enemy does not foster acceptance.  Instead, it makes people defensive.  If you really want walls to come down in relationships, you have to bring yours down, too.

We'll all be better off when we can learn to disagree on principles without personal attacks on those who may be against us.  We're all human.  We all want to be loved and be free to live our lives in the way that we best see fit.  Let's all try to be a little cooler and not create hate where it doesn't exist.